Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Other believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely. Dicuss both views and give your opinion.
It is debatable issue whether information which relate to scientific, business and academic, should be shared, whereas others claim that these kind of knowledge can not be given freely due to its high importance and invaluable. This easy intends to discuss both views. I however, gravitate towards former view.
To embark with, the evidences are plenty to prove why such information should be shared with community. The mammoth recognisable fact is that getting information in any field more likely to prove beneficial to us. If citizens have much knowledge pertaining to business, they can take highly advantage from it. Such information assists us to grow in trade marketing, even could be competed to the international companies with the help of it. In addition, in the field of scientific research ranging from latest technology, in order to procure better living standard, such information is much imperative to the individuals. It assists us to save time and make comfortable accommodation. To illustrate, as per a recent survey in Japan which provides much more knowledge to the native ones, resulting competes the whole world in the term of technology.
However, there are some reasons that such information should be restricted instead of share with community as it may lead unexpected risky situations. If scientific knowledge will go to the criminal's hand then it may use for illegal purpose which could be worst consequences for the nation. Moreover, the another factor is linked to the copy right. If such imperative information will be available on Internet free of charge, the majority of people will utilise such information in the term of personal financial purpose. Since these informations are used on high level purpose in spite of as personally, it has to be retain curtail. There will bad impact on the researches and onwers of those invention.
To sum up, albeit sharing information could be effective to us, in some cases, it should be confined as misuse of this information may bring worst results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ld be shared, whereas others claim that these kind of knowledge can not be given freely du...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'from the latest'.
Suggestion: from the latest
...he field of scientific research ranging from latest technology, in order to procure better ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the worst'.
Suggestion: be the worst
...may use for illegal purpose which could be worst consequences for the nation. Moreover, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 689, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this invention' or 'those inventions'?
Suggestion: this invention; those inventions
... impact on the researches and onwers of those invention. To sum up, albeit sharing informati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'bring the worst'.
Suggestion: bring the worst
...fined as misuse of this information may bring worst results.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, then, whereas, as to, in addition, kind of, in some cases, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17933130699 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92161305442 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58358662614 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8491957541 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.235294118 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245953877303 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707719626042 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542954363314 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157389691005 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263200292954 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.