Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Every country wants to have international cooperation with others to accomplish a win-win project. Nowadays a discussion over whether countries should share as much information as possible or some information cannot be shared because of their importance has been triggered. In my opinion, sharing useful information is the foundation for a successful cooperation, but the choice of the information is also very important.
Some claim that the more information a country shares, the more choices it provides for other countries so that others could pick up some and cooperates with it. What should be emphasized firstly is that countries sharing their information is to get more valuable things. Because it is human nature that people chase profits, so there is no reason for a country to share their information for free. From that we can conclude that the statement only comes true when all countries signed a contract that every participating country should share its information selflessly, and there should be an international institution acting as supervisor to see if any country hides some important technologies. So, the choice of information becomes vital for a country.
Firstly, the choice of information is related with what they would like to harvest from the cooperation. Every country has specific talents and demands, what the government should do is to clearly specify the demands of the country. To be more specific, the sharing of information is to satisfy its requirements, which is like buy something with information. For instance, what Japanese the most needed was the delicate equipment that can predict the earthquake that frequently occurs and recommend some places for people to hide. So, if Japanese government wants to share information, they should find countries that can satisfy their demands.
After selecting target country, the government should make sure that the shared information should trigger interests from other countries. Win-win project means every country gets benefits from the trade, so the government should provide some advanced information as well. Take China as an example, the construction of railroads is one of the most famous advanced Chinese technologies. Chinese has constructed railroads all over their motherland, trains could pass through snow mountain and beneath the bottom of ocean, which attracts many countries. So the construction methods can be shared to others if Chinese government wants to cooperate.
In conclusion, the sharing of information can promote universal cooperation, however, the choice of information to be shared should be considered according to country’s demands and whether their information is appealing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 8.3376753507 420% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53012048193 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01389437397 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474698795181 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2846059098 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.789473684 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254876876782 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988460630192 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803737198955 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184524833001 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673469094462 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.