Some people think governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and diseases. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common truth that health is the foundation for people to achieve success, more and more people try to find ways to keep disease away. Nowadays a new discussion over whether governments dealing with environmental and housing problems can help has been triggered. In my opinion, I agree with this statement because reducing housing problems can both help people emotionally and physically.
Firstly, alleviating housing issues can help people stop feeling stressful, which does good to their mental health. Housing problems are triggered by increasing population and the development of urbanization that increased houses prices so much that most of normal people cannot afford anymore, causing some psychological problems. Take myself as an example, I used to dream about living in the capital of China. The dream failed quickly when I first compared my salary with the housing price and frustratedly found that I needed to work for more than two hundred years without buying anything to purchase a house about fifty square meters. Many negative emotions appeared, I could not live normally because doubts and anxieties occupied my mind, I have been suffering from insomnia since then. If politics about reducing the housing prices can be issued, I believe I can be well.
Meanwhile, housing problems can be dangerous to people’s physical health as well. Housing problems often occur on communities which consist of large density of people. It is this kind of place where can cause such physical healthy problems, especially when they encounter endemic illnesses. To be more specific, the more crowded a place is, people who live there are more likely to be caught. For instance, one of my classmates lives in a crowded community was infected with the coronavirus last month. The population density is so large that people needed to queue about five minutes to enter or exit the gate of the community. So, if one of them was infected by air spread virus, all neighbors would be affected as well. Which is dangerous for the whole society. If the government could control the dense people in one community, the situation would be much better.
In conclusion, I believe that government should focus on coping with housing problems, which can help people avoid mental problems and physical problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15691489362 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66059421939 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566489361702 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7792245091 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.052631579 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244810931372 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792538956824 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735038256319 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186264565357 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692903696836 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.