Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Every country wants to have international cooperation with others to accomplish a win-win project. Nowadays a discussion over whether countries should share as much information as possible or some information cannot be shared because of their importance has been triggered. In my opinion, sharing useful information is the foundation for a successful cooperation, but the choice of the information is also very important.
Some claim that the more information a country shares, the more choices it provides for other countries so that others could pick up some and cooperates with it. What should be emphasized firstly is that countries sharing their information is to get more valuable things. Because it is human nature that people chase profits, so there is no reason for a country to share their information for free. From that we can conclude that the statement only comes true when all countries signed a contract that every participating country should share its information selflessly, and there should be an international institution acting as supervisor to see if any country hides some important technologies. So, the choice of information becomes vital for a country.
Firstly, the choice of information is related with what they would like to harvest from the cooperation. Every country has specific talents and demands, what the government should do is to clearly specify the demands of the country. To be more specific, the sharing of information is to satisfy its requirements, which is like buy something with information. For instance, what Japanese the most needed was the delicate equipment that can predict the earthquake that frequently occurs and recommend some places for people to hide. So, if Japanese government wants to share information, they should find countries that can satisfy their demands.
After selecting target country, the government should make sure that the shared information should trigger interests from other countries. Win-win project means every country gets benefits from the trade, so the government should provide some advanced information as well. Take China as an example, the construction of railroads is one of the most famous advanced Chinese technologies. Chinese has constructed railroads all over their motherland, trains could pass through snow mountain and beneath the bottom of ocean, which attracts many countries. So the construction methods can be shared to others if Chinese government wants to cooperate.
In conclusion, the sharing of information can promote universal cooperation, however, the choice of information to be shared should be considered according to country’s demands and whether their information is appealing.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 8.0752688172 433% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53012048193 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01389437397 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474698795181 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2846059098 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.789473684 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254876876782 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988460630192 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803737198955 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184524833001 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673469094462 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 8.0752688172 433% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53012048193 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01389437397 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474698795181 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2846059098 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.789473684 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254876876782 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988460630192 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803737198955 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184524833001 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673469094462 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.