Some people opine that sharing a lot of information is great, while others think that information should be protected. I completely agree with both views because of several reasons.
On the one side, some information is needed to make a process done correctly. If someone does not want to share information that he has to other people whom we work with, their work will not be completed. For instance, a boss has an information about solving a business case from his former colleagues. Because his current employees need those information to solve company's problem, he shares that information to them. As a result, the boss and his employees successfully solve company's problem.
On the other side, some information is not obtained easily. Thus, it is better to protect them to appreciate the founder of that information. If there is a limitation on who can access this kind of information, only people who is really interested to this information will be willing to give an effort to access this information, which will make it valuable. For example, a researcher did a research about the impact of employee compensation on working performance which took Canadian employees as the samples. Because this type of research is still rare, he wants to protect his information by registering his research as paid-journal type on a repository site. Consequently, only people who really want to access this information will be willing to pay for it so this information will not be spread wastefully.
In conclusion, I completely agree with both views because some information is needed to make a process done correctly and some information is not obtained easily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...ues. Because his current employees need those information to solve companys problem, he shares th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...valuable. For example, a researcher did a research about the impact of employee compensati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, really, so, still, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10256410256 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02072346031 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6002246764 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274727718552 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111160689856 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817818638434 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207781738569 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487707744884 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.