Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y

Essay topics:

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Nowadays, there is a widespread belief that sharing information to people, who work in the domain of business, academic and science is essential, since the idea of distributing a wide range of information is likely assist them to prevent some issues, which in turn, may contribute individuals' standard of living. However, it is worth to take into account that not all of the information ought to be shared because it is highly likely that it may implicate some downsides that will lead to some unavoidable problematic situations. The arguments in support of sharing information are multifaceted, yet, there are also factors that it is worth to keep them under secret. In this essay, I will touch upon each of them.

There are multifarious reasons, why individuals prefer particular information ought to be opened to the public. First and foremost, by sharing out some important information to people working in the field of business, they will be able to tackle problems such as, price and quality. For instance, they are able to improve and create a wide range of commodities at breakneck pace by using various techniques. Therefore, people will be able to purchase not only quality goods but also for reasonable price.

Likewise, it is worth to mention that sharing information might have great impact on improving the lives of people providing that solely right kind of information is given to open public. What Do I mean by improving lives?. People who suffered from serious diseases might be a good example to support my idea. By distributing these informations to a vast amount of sources, will be beneficial, as by preventing these diseases by a large public, they will be able to stop wide spreading these sicknesses into other countries as well as preventing one of the catastrophic problems. However, it does not mean that all information should be given to public.

It is worth to take into consideration that much of the information ought to be restricted from spreading. This information is extremely essential and valuable to be shared them because the improper use of these dates will cause inevitable issues around the world. It can be exemplified by following situation. Some countries manufacture terrific weapons which are able to destroy regions readily enough, but, they will never give their techniques to other countries, particularly, Islamic countries, since this may lead to beginning of the war. Consequently, inappropriate use of techniques and information might be the root cause of embarking on unpreventable disaster.

By way of a conclusion, sharing variety of information like double-edged sword, because there are not only involve benefits that may enhance lives of people but also have a huge negative influence on society as a whole.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng a wide range of information is likely assist them to prevent some issues, wh...
^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e range of information is likely assist them to prevent some issues, which in t...
^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is likely assist them to prevent some issues, which in turn, may contribute in...
^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... is worth to take into account that not all of the information ought to be shared because ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and create a wide range of commodities at breakneck pace by using various techn...
^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce. Likewise, it is worth to mention that sharing information might have grea...
^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mount of sources, will be beneficial, as by preventing these diseases by a large ...
^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they will be able to stop wide spreading these sicknesses into other countries as...
^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cknesses into other countries as well as preventing one of the catastrophic probl...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, i mean, kind of, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 41.998997996 176% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2333.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 451.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17294900222 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99149486853 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494456762749 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 745.2 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 3.0 0.384769539078 780% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.020844752 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.789473684 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7368421053 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290766190471 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907590700113 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558110567906 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165261102067 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401695315579 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.