Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and five your opinion.
In today's era, exchange of information and knowledge about various subjects is quite necessary in order to integrate countries in terms of science, security and innovation. However, some advocate that some information must be confidential, and should not be shared while others contradict it. Hence, I am going to delve into both views of this statement.
To commence with, there are certain realms where sharing of information with everyone can prove to be a catastrophic on account of plethora reasons. Firstly, information which is related to national security and innovation must be not disseminated, because leakage of such information may be misused by certain terrorist groups, which in turn directly and indirectly may affect the sovereignty and tranquility of any country, here it is mandatory to keep such information under strict monitoring. On the top of that, there are many information, which have no have no concern for the public, therefore such information should not be a part of public domain. For instance, if the information regarding making nuclear bomb is in the public domain and accessible to all, then it will just prove as a threat to the existence of humankind, consequently better to keep such information secret.
On the other hand, this world is known for freedom where one wants to have access of inch information owing to manifold reasons. Firstly, there are so many young people who like to do research and innovate on various crucial topics for the development of their country, but they confront myriad problems due to inaccessibility of information, thus information should be freely shared. In addition, if some information will remain confidential then it will be act as a monopoly, and thereby can bring a sense of demotivation for many, which is utterly not acceptable in today's open space.
In conclusion, I reckon that information for the public welfare should be shared, but without any compromise with the national security, peace and so on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and knowledge about various subjects is necessary to integrate countries in term...
^^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'share'
Suggestion: share
...ation must confidential, and should not shared while others contradict it. Hence, I am...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...nitoring. On the top of that, there are many information, which have no have no conc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
...nitoring. On the top of that, there are many information, which have no have no concern for the&...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'have no'.
Suggestion: have no
...that, there are many information, which have no have no concern for the public, therefore&...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i reckon, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61563517915 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.72685698923 2.80592935109 133% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592833876221 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.1513485204 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.727272727 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.1818181818 7.06120827912 243% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194895150191 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849461496771 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508607570757 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125914202897 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501154403384 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.