Some people believe that manufacturers should be responsible for reducing the large amounts of packaging they use Others say consumers should avoid buying heavily packaged items Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons for your answer and in

Essay topics:

Some people believe that manufacturers should be responsible for reducing the large amounts of packaging they use. Others say consumers should avoid buying heavily packaged items. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience.

Parts of society argue that decreasing product’s packaging is sole responsibility of producer. On contrast, some said that purchasing items particularly on unnecessary packaged items are the responsible of the buyer. In my opinion, it is the creators who should encourage their product's package simplification.

First of all, cover of the product could turn into a waste, which would pollute the environment. Therefore, buying a lesser packaged product could be done by the end-user to avoid environmental damage. For example, bringing reusable bag could cut the amount of required packaging thus diminishing the amount of litter caused by unneeded packaging. However, people or authorization could not force consumers to purchase the less packaged product because they have the rights to choose their own product.

On the other hand, many points out that companies are accountable for their product design because they could remake their packaging to become more eco-friendly, decreasing environmental destruction. Besides, products distribution to the customers are often controlled by manufacturers, so they could help the buyer to use less packaged product by providing the particular ones. Carlsberg, a beverage company, is used to sell their cans in a plastic wrap. However, now they have changed it by utilizing glue to hold the cans together, encouraging the importance of sustainability.

All in all, while it is true that consumers should be suggested to buy the simplified packaged product, the main issues of the environmental problems lies with the producer’s role, so it is the makers's responsibility to control and regulate the amount of packaged use in their product.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, first of all, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52692307692 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18464093264 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.892381349 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238214917726 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948012513047 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544139537993 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163757395459 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367243958493 0.056905535591 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.