Some people believe that the media, such as the press, TV and Internet should be more strictly controlled. Others feel that controls should be loosened to give people freer access to information. Discuss both views.
In today’s modern world, the influence of media has been a matter of great concern. While some people claim that the administrator should strictly supervise the way residents use the mass media, others hold the opinion that individuals should be given more right to access to information. Both pros and cons of this controversial issue will analyse in my following essay.
On the one hand, there are reasons why many critics believe that the authority should control the mass media less and provide more right to citizens to connect with various information on these digital gadgets. For example, in China, individuals cannot access with Facebook, Instagram or other networking sites. They just use local websites such as Weibo, Meitu and so on which completely was monitored by the Government. This could result in one-way information circumstance and the citizens are unlikely to know the other side of the world.
On the other hand, it is claimed that cyberspace should be more tightly censored. This is because the disadvantageous content could have an adverse impact on the children. The young people could expose to violent content, terrorism propaganda or pornographic material on television channel or the website making children walk on the criminal road. Secondly, the fake news is appearing constantly on social networking sites leading to the panic in society. This is well illustrated by the evidence that Vietnam Television just warns audiences about one fake fan page regularly posts incorrect information articles which seriously effect on the prestige of VTV and the belief of readers. Therefore, the mass media should be strictly controlled, avoid negative consequences.
In conclusion, the above analyses show that while some critics argue that the press, TV and Internet should be more monitored, others still agree with the idea that the administrator should provide more right to citizens to access the information
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... criminal road. Secondly, the fake news is appearing constantly on social networking sites l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35504885993 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8089849973 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592833876221 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8675874921 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338554292834 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101582166003 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116387633287 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20982615967 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733218366794 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.