Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices
In this fast moving and evolving world it is quite common for an individual to have more options to pick from. I agree with the prompt and believe that one has various alternatives to perform either professional or everyday activities.
To begin with, technology and advancement has been incorporated into our lives by providing us with many choices to carry out any mundane task. For instance, earlier human beings had only one option of using a gas stove to cook food but now they have quite a few options such as induction stove and microwave oven to perform the same job as that of the gas stove. Another example is the availability of clothes, different material, sizes and styles that one can chose from. This depicts the extent of the impact that development has made in everyone’s life.
Further, this impact is not only in personal life but also in professional as well. Let’s take an example for this statement, a software engineer has the option to work from home or office and also has the possibility to execute his or her tasks either by using a laptop or a desktop. This can be applied to other professions, such as scientists who definitely have more than one way to carry out an experiment. Thus, it is evident with the mention examples human beings provide themselves with diverse choices.
To sum up, in light of the above one can safely that the author is not wrong in his or her statement that people do have too many alternatives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t people do have too many alternatives.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68871595331 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64344700702 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587548638132 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1206452981 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.545454545 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112709871335 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395926465581 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544899199193 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854491179119 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637951173271 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.