With developments in the economy and technology, people are living in a world that has a variety of choices. Some people argue that there are too many choices nowadays. While I agree that this situation is true for some people, others still have only a few choices.
On the one hand, people living in developed countries or wealthy regions can enjoy a variety of choices and they may even feel overwhelmed by the number of options they have. Take television programs as an example, there are hundreds of programs that people can watch, but they often find it difficult to enjoy any of those because they can not stop surfing all the channels. Back in the old days when there were only one or two channels, people could have family time in front of the TV. Similarly, this situation also occurs in the supermarket. People are overwhelmed by numerous domestic and foreign goods and tend to buy unnecessary items impulsively. While having many choices has some benefits, having too many options results in an obstacle to make decisions.
On the other hand, there are still many people living in underdeveloped areas, who have far fewer choices than the rich. Since they only have a limited amount of disposable income, they are prevented from many options that require a large amount of money. For instance, poor families would not bother choosing which country to travel during holidays because any choice would be too expensive. For them, instead of having too many choices, the real problem is the opposite. As a result, they work hard to pursue more choices for them and their next generation.
From my perspective, it is true that some wealthy people may have too many choices. However, this is not the case for many others living in underdeveloped regions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, still, while, for instance, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87707641196 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5210234012 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538205980066 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3918753709 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.75 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228461366405 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088197815244 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621547319503 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165686504265 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230364737825 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.