Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
People have different views about how much choice we possess with regard to our life decisions today. While some posit that modern life proposes a more restricted set of options to people, I believe that in these days we encounter superfluous number of options in any facet of our lives because of technology, education and science.
First, recent progression in technology provides us with an open set of options in many occasions. As an epitome of this consider today's fast referigator carrying trucks which are used to transport fruits between cities. This technology gives us the opportunity to eat whatever fruit we want at any time in a year. Such vast set of selections was not available to our predecessors.
Next, the education growth has been experienced in all the countries of the world. This helps different storeys of the society to live lives similar to each other. For example, in the past if you were son of a farmer then you couldn't become an engineer because there were no university, probably, in your hometown, but now, thanks to the development of education in societies, even a child in a village can study in a school and pursue a career path discrepant from his parents. Thus, people have so many options for their jobs.
Finally, science made us more choices in life. Thanks to science achievements, today, people enjoy more longevity, while in past, a lot of people died in ages less than 70. Should someone live a longer life, he will have more activities to do. For example, my grandparents travel to various countries each year. Last year, they went to Australia, and remained there for three weeks. This was not an option for their own parents since they both passed away when they were int their thirties due to an epidemic disease. Therefore, science also had a salient role in increased choices each of us have in today's life.
In conclusion, even though some argue that modern human has more limited selections in his life, I personally postulate that today, humans have been buried in a burden of excessive choices mainly due to advancements in technology, learning and science.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... open set of options in many occasions. As an epitome of this consider todays fast...
^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er. For example, in the past if you were son of a farmer then you couldnt become ...
^^
Line 9, column 219, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...n the past if you were son of a farmer then you couldnt become an engineer because ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...t if you were son of a farmer then you couldnt become an engineer because there were n...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 122, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...day, people enjoy more longevity, while in past, a lot of people died in ages less than...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91412742382 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6518276239 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590027700831 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2703258606 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147500209753 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044579167641 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571121278151 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824180633048 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460137839947 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.