Some people believe that the personal information of violent criminals should be made available to the public. Others think that this information should be protected.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is a common belief that the individual information related to criminals should be secured. However, there are more arguments that this should be spread widely to society due to expanding awareness of the residents about dangerous proponents.
On the one hand, this information belongs to the owner which means private information. According to government regulation, the personal information must be kept in private because it comes to personal rights. Regardless of individuals, who reveals to someone about personal information, that means they are intruding on the personal life of these individuals. Take the bank organization, for example, if this company spoiled individual information about customers such as salary, role, position … It proves that they are directly invading personal life, potentially causing a fierce effect and violating the personal rights of humans. It seems evidence to customers filing suit with this institution.
However, the information involves the serious criminals that’s why the police should inform the community to raise their caution. Mostly criminals tend to make dangerous situations, therefore, the residents should perceive them as soon as possible. One way is to avoid them as far as they are able to, another is to make an alert to police for treating criminals in an appropriate way. For instance, in case of dangerous criminals like killing people but they have already escaped, the police institutions utilizes the social media to spread the news to everyone, aiming to prevent them as well as having more details to easily catch them.
In short, while it is apparent that the information of intrusive criminals should be kept personal, even so, it is more evidence that this information should be widespread to the public community to enhance the cautious spirit of individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he one hand, this information belongs to the owner which means private informatio...
^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...individuals. Take the bank organization, for example, if this company spoiled ind...
^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... alert to police for treating criminals in an appropriate way. For instance, in case of dangerous cri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at this information should be widespread to the public community to enhance the c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, even so, for example, for instance, in short, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39583333333 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91248874051 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8754612044 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31090139866 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121040188386 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887452554248 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21010147396 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728267572302 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.