In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
In Vietnam as well as plenty of countries in the world, a vital status quo is that people living in their hometown start migrating to urban areas, leading to the declining number of countryside dwellers. In my point of view, this population expanding in cities is a negative aspect.
To begin with, as we can see, the ecosystem and infrastructure in cities are degraded. People living in cities are truly crowded, the increase of immigrants into downtown leads to the lack of accommodation for inhabitants, causing a huge pressure on the government to address this issue. Besides that, employment opportunities will be too narrow to seek a job, making an individual's income go down dramatically. Moreover, the more apartment buildings are built, the more green space areas fall down.
On the other hand, in contrast to the city center, the mass exodus from rural areas lead to a lack of people to grow crops and raise livestock, causing the significantly decreasing amount of food production. Besides that, leading to declining economies and farming resources. Apart from that, nowadays, an enormous number of young generations are leaving to big cities for work or study. The knowledge and expertise go down considerably in the countryside because of this generation. For instance, knowledge is narrow, limiting the application of technology in the production process, farmers must spend a lot of time generating food quantities.
In conclusion, rural residents migrate to urban areas, making people are living in countryside fall down is a negative implications. Principally, affecting infrastructure layout in cities and causing the loss of food production.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... be too narrow to seek a job, making an individuals income go down dramatically. Moreover, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'implication'?
Suggestion: implication
... in countryside fall down is a negative implications. Principally, affecting infrastructure ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30303030303 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09279317206 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2662732775 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.692307692 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189115808373 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634030783463 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583292802715 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125312698493 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529636044858 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.