In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development

In Vietnam, as in many other nations throughout the world, a critical status quo is that people begin migrating to cities, resulting in a decline in the number of rural dwellers. In my opinion, city population growth is a negative factor.
To begin with, as we can see, urban ecosystems and infrastructure are deteriorating. People living in cities are extremely crowded; the influx of immigrants into downtown areas leads to a scarcity of housing for residents, putting enormous pressure on the government to address this issue. Furthermore, employment prospects will be limited, causing an individual's income to plummet substantially. Furthermore, when more apartment buildings are constructed, more green space areas are lost.

In contrast to the city center, the widespread flight from rural areas results in a lack of people to grow crops and raise livestock, resulting in a considerable decrease in food production. Furthermore, it is causing deteriorating economies and agricultural resources. Aside from that, a large number of young people are moving to metropolitan cities for work or education. Because of this generation, knowledge and expertise are declining significantly in the rural areas. Farmers, for example, must spend a lot of time manufacturing food amounts because knowledge is limited, limiting the application of technology in the production process.
In conclusion, rural residents migrate to metropolitan cities, causing people residing in the countryside to decline, which has negative repercussions. Specifically, hurting city infrastructure and resulting in a loss of food output.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...t prospects will be limited, causing an individuals income to plummet substantially. Furthe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...iduals income to plummet substantially. Furthermore, when more apartment buildings are cons...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucted, more green space areas are lost. In contrast to the city center, the wide...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...gricultural resources. Aside from that, a large number of young people are moving to metropolitan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f technology in the production process. In conclusion, rural residents migrate t...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67768595041 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34974898315 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607438016529 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.876900356 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.692307692 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207985791831 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064001498019 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565904716551 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126312273605 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520377823372 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...t prospects will be limited, causing an individuals income to plummet substantially. Furthe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...iduals income to plummet substantially. Furthermore, when more apartment buildings are cons...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucted, more green space areas are lost. In contrast to the city center, the wide...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...gricultural resources. Aside from that, a large number of young people are moving to metropolitan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f technology in the production process. In conclusion, rural residents migrate t...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67768595041 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34974898315 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607438016529 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.876900356 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.692307692 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207985791831 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064001498019 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565904716551 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126312273605 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520377823372 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.