Raising household electricity fees is the most effective solution to the problems associated with power generation and environmental pollution.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective in reducing the environmental pollution caused by power generation?
It is a common belief that increasing the cost of electricity usage for individuals’ houses is sufficient to confine environmental problems by producing electricity.
However, I firmly believe that It’s not the best choice in general and it can be rectified by utilizing renewable energy sources.
In reality, the consumption of electricity for residents only makes up a small part of the overall picture. Whereas, the usage of this power in industrial production has accounted for the highest one, this is also the main reason causing severe issues related with the environment. In fact, regarding the statistics in Viet Nam, the proportion of electricity power used in factories and industry stand at more than half of all energy use, whilst residential energy usage just only make up roughly 20 percent. Thus, the interference of household electricity bills would not be a great way to mitigate pollution.
Nevertheless, there are other solutions to the problem of pollution. One approach to cope with the environmental problems caused by electricity usage is by displacing marine renewable energy resources. Nowadays, besides the electricity we are also figuring out and implementing ocean energy with the same quality but not leading to pollution because it comes with abundant natural resources. For example, people have produced renewable energy from tide, wave, solar power .. and used in certain areas to alter electricity effectively. It seems to be an outstanding development in the power sector and not affected by environmental problems.
In short, I can see that raising the bills for an individual's electricity use is not enough contribution to tackle environmental issues, nonetheless, the matter can be resolved by increasing the use of renewable energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 473, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ble energy from tide, wave, solar power .. and used in certain areas to alter elec...
^^
Line 4, column 476, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... energy from tide, wave, solar power .. and used in certain areas to alter electric...
^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...I can see that raising the bills for an individuals electricity use is not enough contribut...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectricity use is not enough contribution to tackle environmental issues, nonethel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, thus, whereas, as to, for example, in fact, in general, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42960288809 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15036455877 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58844765343 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2245438779 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.692307692 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150627243162 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607111509781 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032116488183 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780582795052 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428857019388 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.