People should only concentrate on a single skill for life because it is the best way to succeed.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is a common belief that people should only push almost effort on one skill for life to be an optimal way for achievement. However, I don’t totally agree with this statement. I firmly believe that individuals should attain the diversity of skills to broaden their knowledge and more opportunities.
To begin with, it is obvious that the more people own various skills, the more their knowledge is expanded and intensive. While people only have a comprehensive aspect about a particular sector. They are just able to rely on this resource to work and confront problems. Furthermore, people who have insight in different aspects, they can be conscious of thoroughly impacts which were met in their profession to solve hardship easily. In fact, they can develop technological programs with proficiency. In contrast, some of them can not communicate with clients as foreigners, that is a disadvantage that limits them to get the full requirements of the project to work smoothly and dispose of mistakes.
On top of that, the variety of skills open more opportunities for the career path. In contemporary context, numerous companies are laid off with a mass employment rate due to the artificial intelligence being formed. That is the reason the criteria of recruitment is requested higher. Thus, it expects people having more skills to adapt with changes. For example, a staff member working in real estate, unfortunately, was laid off. Nonetheless, this employee have strength about languages with a high degree. This staff can be a tutor to teach about languages in the educational center. It’s such an ideal opportunity when people have more skills.
In a nutshell, people tend to focus on a single skill that seems the best way to succeed. It is more advantageous that people should have more than one skill to help them extend their horizons and more choices in modern society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ir knowledge is expanded and intensive. While people only have a comprehensive aspect...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tificial intelligence being formed. That is the reason the criteria of recruitmen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, thus, while, as for, for example, in contrast, in fact, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07717041801 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87643538829 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575562700965 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5280413764 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1052631579 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3684210526 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252132959527 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078379873489 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709563520536 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173366714744 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733157177927 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.