Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There have been heated controversies over the destinations of future work. While some people believe that experts such as doctors and technicians should be ordered to serve their countries in which they received training, others highlight the freedom of choice regarding their future workplace. Although there is compelling evidence for the first clause, from my perspective, the latter one makes more sense.
On the one hand, supporters of retaining professionals point out the benefits in terms of cultural acquaintance as well as familiar conditions. It is indisputable that experts are more likely to have deep understanding and better cultural knowledge of their home soils rather than other places. To be more specific, doctors are certainly used to the common diseases and illnesses in their neighborhood, which facilitates them to have more accurate diagnoses as well as offer proper medications for their patients. This will obviously raise their reputations and bring them some potential promotion opportunities throughout their careers. Moreover, a majority of individuals emphasize the professionals’ responsibility to contribute their expertise and efforts to their nations. As many people say, working domestically and serving fellow citizens would be an act of showing gratitude and appreciation for the country.
On the other hand, opponents of demanding professionals to work within a particular place highlight the working conditions and some alternative solutions to support their motherlands. First and foremost, workers can get access to modern and fascinating working environments, which enhances their satisfaction and provides them with ideal conditions to develop skills and broaden their knowledge relating to their professions. In addition, there is an array of ways for people to help their home soils without having to work directly at where they were educated. For instance, doctors can send money back home to help improve the quality of technical training for potential medical masters. Moreover, engineers can consider purchasing cutting-edge devices and inventions for their countries to raise the level of the domestic industry.
To sum up, it is understandable why people are asking doctors and technicians to stay and serve their countries. However, I still believe professionals deserve the right to freely decide their workplaces, given some aforementioned benefits they can gain for themselves.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2084.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72527472527 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12218959485 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6685994028 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287929136726 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898976984567 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775226257084 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187931215038 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504592367495 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.