Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Reading books is conventionally believed to be more educational and entertaining for children compared to playing games on computers and gluing their eyes to their favorite TV show. From my perspective, I completely agree with this and believe that books offer a wide range of advantages that can never be found in cartoons and games.
First and foremost, no one can deny the fantastic values books provide to children that computer games and television programmes lack of. Unlike animated movies shown on TV, where all the images of the characters and their actions are completely displayed on the screen, books hide them under an array of printed words on pages. This lets children cognitively construct the picture of the scene through reading those pages and thus, stimulates their comprehension and imagination. Besides, frequent reading also enhances children's critical thinking skills. Since some subsequent incidents of the story characters may not be mentioned in the book, this allows adolescents to contemplate and make inferences about them.
Apart from benefiting their cognitive abilities, consistent reading is the key to better academic performance. First, books has been long ago referred as the main source of vocabularies for children which thus, develop their writing skills and eventually, language skills. To illustrate this, it has been reported that majority of pupils who do excellently in language subjects said to devote most of their time reading stories. Furthermore, spending time on books also improves students' concentration and memory, the two most essential classroom skills which leads to them being able to have a more comprehensive understand of what is being taught in their lessons.
To sum up, nothing can substitute reading story books as a hobby even the prevalent computer games or most interesting TV show for their benefits at every turn. Hence, I believe that students should spare more time reading rather than squandering it on gaming or useless cartoons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 78
- Today TV channels provide man s sport shows more than women s sport shows why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concert between 2010 and 2015 56
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 78
- Some people think that the qualities of a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Since
...nces childrens critical thinking skills.Since some subsequent incidents of the story ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (TV) must be used with a third-person verb: 'shows'.
Suggestion: shows
...t computer games or most interesting TV show for its benefits at every turn. Hence, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, hence, may, so, thus, apart from, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42172523962 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87409626135 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632587859425 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.3825770659 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.416666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29258637119 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104610075378 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590434439715 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185326454245 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512194927993 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.