Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
At childen’s age, we tend to be impressionable by various types of recreation. Therefore, there is an emphasis on the selection of materials. Many parents do believe that story reading is much better for children’s development rather than TV programmes and computer games. I advocate this idea and I would state my position below.
In the first place, book’s publications yield moral values for the sake of youngsters. Every book has to go through multiple processes of censorship and edition before coming to the hand of readers. Then, it will be subject to parents’ consideration, ensuring their child can receive the best materials. For example, a renowned book like “Snow White and the seven Dwafts” has been a bedside book of all generations, lingering in our mind the lesson that good people will earn what they deserve. It is of flat contradiction compared with video games, which bring nothing but entertainment and addiction.
Second of all, playing video games and watching TV too much are believed to do harm to youngster’s physical and mental health. Eyestrain and constant tiredness result in children’s low academic reports. Their mind can also be overloaded with cartoon characters, virtual weapons,.., which causes them to be low on the uptake at school. Some also play truant in order to do what they prefer, playing games to be specific. While these demerits certainly get on parents’ nerves, a lucrative choice should be books and stories, which nourish their offsprings’ mind rather than spoil them.
To sum up, moral merits and health guarantee are the things that emphasizes the upside of reading stories from books. Parents should be thorough enough to shape up a logical and beneficial range of books for their children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...with cartoon characters, virtual weapons,.., which causes them to be low on the up...
^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ith cartoon characters, virtual weapons,.., which causes them to be low on the upt...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18881118881 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87295162578 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660839160839 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2701626733 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.75 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292190210354 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785216288659 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963325920956 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158500403836 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407522573411 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.