Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction today.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is suggested that communication among people is damaged attribute to mobile devices. While some claim there are values related to their convenience, I would side with those decrying the propagation of a passive lifestyle.
Supporters of smartphones can point to their alleged benefits for their wide range of functionality in an age of mobile devices. If you need some information on the topic, you can search for it easily on the internet of mobiles rather than finding it from the books. In addition, cell phones give you an opportunity such as keep in touch with your friends and make new friends because of their applications like Skype even though they have much space among them. For example, the WWW reports that there have been 30,000 long-distance calls in 10 years. Thus, mobile phones have more importance due to their convenience.
Those who argue against cell phones are typically wary of isolation. In the era before smartphones, it was more common for people to meet up at large social gatherings or could see each other face-to-face. This still happens today but it is less common because smart-phones allow individuals to communicate and staying connected with their friends in the privacy of their own homes. If sedentary life goes on like this, years of relationships between people can slow down or stop altogether. Thus, social communication should be encouraged among the community in order to intervene them isolation.
To sum up, an age of mobile phones has harmful impact on social connection.
Direct communication should be inspired in order to save traditional affairs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15648854962 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88363009654 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637404580153 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6069281083 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101127493954 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329210177543 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276892888333 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0489433729975 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026412701625 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.