Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to young children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the last few years new ideas and believes arose around the improving the society and reinforcing relationships among citizens. People have divergent opinions about potential benefits of introduction compulsory programs to schools, including charity works, social activities and teaching the youngsters by students. Observing all advantages and disadvantages, I reckon, that the idea is more beneficial than negatively influential.
One reason for that could be that proposing the unpaid services amid students would become the first step to development well-mannered citizens from them. It is saddenly to say, but today’s generation underestimates the importance of charity works and neighborhood facilities. So, the introduction of programs, courses and parties in high school education would be likely to lead our country to modern, civilized and loving community.
Another reason might be the lack of age group communications among citizens nowadays. And the propaganda flow with social activities and charity work will probably increase its level. This can be seen in the way that high graduate students could become a role model for younger ones, teaching them some new skills and watching their own code of conduct. Cleaning and decorating streets for New Year and Cristmas, certainly not affecting their dignity, might also reinforce neighbors’ relationship.
Of course, those who say that students must not be obliged to do unpaid community activities are quite correct. The idea that these types of work will be introduce to high schools on the compulsory basis does not sound good for me. As students are overloaded with already existed compulsory subjects and it could just distract them from their main aim. Moreover, because students could be encouraged to carry out the charity and uncharity works by other methods. For instance, today at several schools there are volunteer groups with people who want to help community and nature out of good will and intentions, so their amount could be just doubled several times in each school and university.
In conclusion, I would like to point, despite all disadvantages, the trend of proposing unpaid services among schools is rather positive from my view, but only on volunteer basis.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, so, well, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44571428571 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88993185429 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602857142857 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0031670942 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255670236663 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756649325883 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446904958057 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125005426698 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487785393561 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.