Some people believe that when designing a building, the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are tons of builds that not only have beautiful appearance but also are equipped with advanced technologies in this modern world. Although it is true that building with advanced functions could improve our living standards, but I would argue that the appearance of architectures also plays a crucial role in people’s daily life.
It is more likely to have a comfortable and convenient life for people who live in Houses equipped with multiple functions. It is mainly because people can sue these advanced technologies to help them deal with some problems about their work or daily exercise. For Instance, there are a number of buildings with several functions in university, including playing basketball, playing football, watching movies and so on, and these architectures are not only just functioned as a place for students studying, but also they can use it to do some leisure activities. As a result, these students do not need to go to the gym which is far from their university, instead doing sports in these buildings after class. So they will find university life more convenient and possibly gain a better experience in their university.
On the other hand, good appearance buildings can have a positive influence on people’s mood and make their life more colourful.. People who visit some Good-looking buildings are likely to have a lot fun. For example, it may attract most of visitors’ attention and these visitors can have an enjoyable time in these places if some theme museums can be built based on their themes. As a consequence, their life would be more colourful due to the gorgeous and awesome architecture styles. In contrast, these ugly buildings are always not welcomed because it may affect people’s mood adversely.
In conclusion, despite the fact that the multiple functions of houses indeed bring people
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... mood and make their life more colourful.. People who visit some Good-looking bui...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15894039735 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92972827232 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549668874172 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8581750587 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.846153846 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103046327005 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420998304707 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243741622437 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679765215202 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204804973925 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.