Workers work at home due to modern technology. Many people say that only these employees and not employer can benefit from it. Do you agree or disagree?
The development of technology has changed the ways people live their lives. In particular, a number of employees can even work at home and many people say that only these employees and not employer can benefit from it. However, I would argue modern technology can are beneficial to everyone.
High-tech has made education easy access to everyone, and students who are just studying at home can also complete a degree. For example, In the distance learning programmes, students can access the same content of degree course as those who attend lectures in person. They can read relevant materials, such as textbooks, class notes, etc.. When they have problems in comprehending some key concepts, they can click the pause button and reply the video until they fully digest information.
Meanwhile, people who have been working or studying in another city can use some technological products to keep in touch with their family members, and even face-to-face communication. For instance, someone who works in another city which is far away from his hometown is more likely to choose to use communication tools to contact their spouse. By contrast, taking a plane or train would be cost must money and time. As a result, technology has indeed brought many benefits to ordinary people.
However, there is no double that Technology makes our work more convenient and time-saving. For example, workers every day would spend much time traveling to and from work. Time is extremely important for every company. employees can finish their task at home with the help of technology. For instance, workers who need to control the computer to operate machine will not go to the company, because these employees can use their computers to command the machine and complete work.
In conclusion, technology can be beneficial to people from all walks of life. It makes our life more convenient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...als, such as textbooks, class notes, etc.. When they have problems in comprehendin...
^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Employees
... extremely important for every company. employees can finish their task at home with the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12662337662 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70718288638 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587662337662 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.095881019 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7222222222 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302254444981 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913020125798 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128087241016 0.0667982634062 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175430408708 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138395727266 0.056905535591 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.