Some people believe that women should be treated as equal to men when applying for a job with police or the military. Others think women are less suitable for this kind of job. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some jobs are gender biased, especially the professions like army and police force. However, most of the people believe that these jobs opportunities should be made available for opposite sex as well. This essay will state the view and my opinion along with the supporting examples.
Most of the females, in the modern times, are stronger than a majority of the males. As women too are these days health-oriented. In addition to that, they timely visit physical fitness centres. Many girls, for instance, visit gym either to stay in shape or to build muscles just like men. Therefore, in my view, the amendments in the hiring policies should be made. Undoubtedly, they are equally capable of accomplishing a task as well as their counterparts.
On the other hand, some are of the opinion that these occupations demand a person to be mentally and emotionally strong. Whereas, females are stigmatised to be sensitive and fragile. As a result, claimed to be inept for admission in these departments. I personally think that this is a stereotypical mindset which can only be changed by educating people in this area.There are, like, several numbers of successful female figures with robust attitude who are employed in the military in some countries. That is why I am against the idea of not permitting females to be admitted in these sectors to work.
To sum up, eligibility criteria for selection of the right candidate should not be gender based but rather upon the skills which are essential for a particular position. Recruitment standard is needed to be raised.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... stronger than a majority of the males. As women too are these days health-oriente...
^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...hanged by educating people in this area.There are, like, several numbers of successfu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02681992337 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88004377798 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4494296605 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308874685143 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793041465257 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543476107091 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169719952133 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650839759988 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.