Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
There is no doubt that recycling plays a vital role to tackle with environmental issue. It is said that governments should introduce a new law to stimulate people to recycle their housing waste. From my perspective, I do not agree with this stance because of several grounds.
In reality,if the governments want to encourage domestic waste recycling, laws are not the only possible measure. It is not only because people do not absolutely volunteer to do that, but it is impossible to make recyling become a positive habit in their life. Besides, instead of obligating people follow the recylcing laws, the other ways can be considered to make people do more recycling. By using communication media, the information about recycling and its helpfulness can be expanded into community, and then, more and more people can realize the necessary and essential role of recycling in both financial effects and environmental protection. Furthermore, the governments can organize the field trips for local people to visit the recycling factories, where they can improve their consciousness as well as be trained how to recycle their housing ways; after that, they can try to frequently practice those knowledge at home.
Secondly, it is utterly possible for governments to do more practical and reliable activities rather than lanching the recycling legislation. The clear illistration of this is that the research on recycling can be carriout in local community. A handful of families can join to try the trial models such as making fertilizers from food waste to recognize how efficient and reasonable they are, after that, because of these effective results, other families can be a tendency of recycling as much as posible. Moreover, the governments can improve the educational systems by adding lessons about recycling. Were the students to be taught about recycling, they would realise accurately the vital role of recycle and possibly make the future life better.
In conclusion, although introducing a recycling obligation is necessary, the governments should pay more attention to improve people's awareness as well as conduct other sustainable measures in order to encourage peple do more recycling than they used to be.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , if
... because of several grounds. In reality,if the governments want to encourage domes...
^^^
Line 2, column 909, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'those knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; those knowledges
...at, they can try to frequently practice those knowledge at home. Secondly, it is utterly possi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30028328612 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97280944567 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532577903683 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8839235105 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.642857143 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337259291627 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123074779742 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567445811813 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213127997643 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062177280865 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.