As a result of global warming and consecutive devastating natural disasters the concern on alleviating these situations are growing. For this regard, some people believe that recycling domestic wastes are not sufficient and enforcing strict law from governments is an only solution. In my opinion, besides the aforementioned suggestion, there are other practices that need to be taken into consideration.
To begin with, just like using safety belt that has become a spontaneous act when someone sits in car, separating the rubbish based on paper, plastic, and glass will be done unconsciously if it became a law. In other word, it is hard to make people from different mindset and different age group to get them to do certain task unless they are afraid of being punished. For this reason, I believe that the best way for increasing the rate on recycling the household wastes is that authorities and city planners should set a strict legislation and allocate hefty fine on someone who are not conscious of their rubbish separation.
On the other hand, there are other steps that can be beneficial for encouraging people to do recycling. Firstly, media is approved to be an effective platform on altering people's way of thinking. For example, by constant broadcasting programs which its content is appreciating and respecting eco-warier, individuals will eventually eagerly done similar thing so as to gain respect in society. Secondly, investing more in providing recycling facilities is also influential in boosting recycling activity among public. Since, a lot of people are reluctant to do so just because of lack of these amenities.
In conclusion, it is true that making recycling a legal activity is significant in making individuals to protect their environment but there are other ways such as streaming relative programs on TV and making recycling machines more accessible, can be done in this matter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 360, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...l eventually eagerly done similar thing so as to gain respect in society. Secondly, inve...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23376623377 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99106867522 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7868900531 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8333333333 7.06120827912 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35085696161 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109349417068 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095103689696 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205299957436 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303532476388 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.