Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is said that the amount of waste being recycled from homes was not enough. For that, some people say that the government needs to establish a legal requirement in order to encourage more citizens to recycle. In my point of view, this notion is such a good thing that it can change the look of our planet Earth due to the fact that the interference of government will make a huge impact and more people will know about this law. In this essay, I will state my own opinion on this topic.
The government is an authoritative authority in a country. Because of that, their interference to this issue can make new changes for the better. As far as I’m concerned, the global environment is getting more and more contaminated. It may be predicted that we might make the earth back to the prehistoric times if we don’t take action now. In addition, the environment plays a crucial role in the growth of economy of a country. That’s the reason why the Prime Minister of every country should form a law that’s really affective to protect the environment as soon as possible. And recycling is the best choice to reduce trash. If the law is established, each person won’t break it as they don’t want to expect to pay fines. Moreover, many people will support and spread the law since the government’s words are powerful and influential.
However, the government should consider carefully about the method of maintenance and some suitable punishments. The government is not the only one who is responsible for making the nation green but it also needs the unity of a country. If people create a better look for the environment together, they will understand it’ll be worth it as they make a little contribution to the development. That explains for the importance of the responsibility of each individual combined with the government.
In conclusion, the idea of making recycling increase by the legal law of the government is a good way. However, we need to do our best to follow the rule as well as conserving the environment voluntarily.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77464788732 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8764053257 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52676056338 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.587311508 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2105263158 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6842105263 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370179906137 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982412058378 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914602699045 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218417112482 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454426922948 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.