Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It has been suggested that trash from homes is need to be recycled. In order to reuse more and more waste, some people say that the government should take their action such as legalization. I think that making it legal would be influential, and laws are required to increase recycling.
First of all, in this industrialized world, reusing waste is the way in which turn garbage into useful stuff such as flooring material, and it is effective for both government and people. This is because, in recent years, people have invented recycling machines, and if the government enacts a law to recycle waste, the technologies will be able to operate. For example, the government should make a categorizing waste into recycling and non-recycling legal requirement, thus people will classify their waste, which makes recycling easier. Furthermore, in order to make people follow the law, give them some money back so that people will be happy to collaborate with government.
Moreover, endorsing a law for recycling would have some effects on environment and economy. The reason for this is that waste would be lessen as people recycle their junks, which is good for environment, and fortune would made by convert waste into sellable things. In addition, the government ought to focus more on people’s understandings of recycling, and should have spot advertisement on TV. As a result, by recognizing advantages of recycling people will be encouraged to recycle reusable waste such as plastic bottle.
In conclusion, due to advantages of recycling I mentioned above, I think that government should take their action as soon as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...good for environment, and fortune would made by convert waste into sellable things. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18490566038 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96562482123 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524528301887 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3511997357 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452080286232 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169224308926 0.084324248473 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719530602074 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266893983394 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891509159555 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.