Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to make people recycle more is to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Nowadays, recycling the waste was the most troublesome issue which the world is facing. A few individuals believe that only a limited waste from houses was being recycled. These people utter that the government has to form a legal requirement which is the only method to improve recycling. This essay discusses the necessity of laws for reprocessing the waste in homes.
People are not ready to keep an extra burden on their shoulders in their busy schedule. Many of them don’t think about recycling the waste. Even though, these people know that the trash may lead to severe environmental degradation, they simply avoid the thought. People also think that it was not their responsibility to do such things. The ideology of a few people will be like “If I don't do this recycling, I will not go to prison nor there will be any punishment and no fine will be imposed”. So, people simply neglect this work and move on with their regular works. These reasons explain the people way of thinking in the absence of any laws towards recycling the waste.
A very small amount of people are really concerned about the health ailments if the waste is not recycled. However, they may also show negligence towards unnecessary things and will not be ready for any extra efforts. If the government introduces a new law for recycling the home waste such as punishing the person or imposing fine or imprisonment, then every individual will be self-responsible and does the recycling of their home waste regularly. If they do not have any time to perform, as there is a law they automatically create and allow separate hours for reprocessing their domestic waste. Thus, finally, all the members of the country follow this procedure. The government also has to make a step towards cognizance of the methods and ways how the waste can be recycled.
To summarize, If the people follow recycling, there will be a decrease in pollution and moreover, that country or state environment will be prone to the least degradation in comparison to others. In my opinion, there should be laws imposed for increasing the recycling process of the home waste as it produces a healthy environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...of a few people will be like 'If I dont do this recycling, I will not go to pri...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, then, thus, as to, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92953929539 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81962920002 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50406504065 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4514114269 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7368421053 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4210526316 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319194095898 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103337285803 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052437169141 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19590924439 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503894698256 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.