Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it legal requirement.
To what extent do you think law are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Nowadays acceptable volume of home-made rubbish has hardly been recycled recently. Among the different solution, some people insist on legal requirements which should be passed by government, although legal restrictions may effect on recycling pattern, I think rarely, have enforcement been able to deal with such issues.
So people believe that, government must inflict pressure on populace to participate in recycling home-made waste more. In other words, if people was punished because of their failure, they would collaborate more. In addition, some people have shown that they do their duties better, under an external force. So that people may be involved in recycling activities when they had an adequate fear of related penalties. By the way when people recognize an activity as a law, they persuade themselves to obey it unless they were guilty. In fact by pass a legal for recycling the waste of home, people will be compelled to take part in these activities as well as possible.
On the other hand, I think impose pressure on people for doing something, make them exhausted. In other words, I suppose all thing which have deter people from doing the best thing is their ignorance. Indeed, government should increase the awareness of society by an appropriate education firstly, then by applying an adequate and organized encouragement system convince people to participate in recycling programs. In fact, before imposing the pressure by legislation, the best solution should be institutionalized through the culture of people by increasing their knowledge.
As a conclusion, I could infer, government may increase the people participation in recycling the home-made waste, why some people obligate themselves to obey the laws, nevertheless, I reckon before inflicting any extra pressure on society, it is better to improve the consciousness among the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...rnment, although legal restrictions may effect on recycling pattern, I think rarely, h...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'think'.
Suggestion: rarely think
...ions may effect on recycling pattern, I think rarely, have enforcement been able to deal wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...duties better, under an external force. So that people may be involved in recycling act...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n these activities as well as possible. On the other hand, I think impose pressu...
^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'deterred'.
Suggestion: deterred
...r words, I suppose all thing which have deter people from doing the best thing is the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ove the consciousness among the people.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, well, i reckon, i suppose, i think, in addition, in fact, as well as, by the way, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41638225256 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96320039123 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569965870307 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5926700002 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.076923077 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6153846154 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38403952404 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140177439481 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437494879629 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215200691411 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740400053851 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.