Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
According to some people, using computers, people can see historical objects and art work through them without physically going to art galleries or museums. I totally disagree to this statement as I feel that the experience one get by visiting theses places is completely different from seeing them on a screen and moreover, spending some time with those things is the only method to understand the value and importance of such precious objects.
The experience gained by visiting places personally such as museums and art exhibitions is a complete out of world experience. Youngsters and students will learn a great deal of knowledge about history and art which cannot be appreciated on a computer monitor as it is devoid of the bueatiful sarroundings of those exhibits. Additionally computer screens create fatigue to eyes and cannot represent the same data that a local guide who is present in such exhibitions.
Spending time with precious objects is a wonder option that is not available over the internet or web based viewing of a place. For example, when we see a fossil or a skeleton of a unknow animal from the past we instantaneously recognise its value and importance, whereas, the same material presented to us via a picture has less impact. Therefore, it imperative to have a close look of such objects to understand them.
To sum up, I feel places like art exhibitions and museums need to be seen with our own eyes rather than visualising its listed of contents on a computer in the form of photographs or videos because personal visits provide us with wonderful experience time spent there is useful in understanding the value they have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...eatiful sarroundings of those exhibits. Additionally computer screens create fatigue to eyes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
..., when we see a fossil or a skeleton of a unknow animal from the past we instanta...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for example, i feel, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97841726619 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90176982238 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.4211595296 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.777777778 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8888888889 20.7667163134 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259178147178 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973460103115 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106202771284 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146457687236 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920873340246 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.