Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.
-How far do you agree?
-What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
Nobody can deny that there are certain professionals like nurses, doctors and teachers who are essential to the fabric of society, and who should therefore be rewarded accordingly. However, this is seldom the case. When we look at the salaries and fees commanded by certain film stars and actresses and people who run large companies, this does not seem fair.
First of all, not all film stars earn huge sums of money. In fact, at any one time in the UK, for example, roughly 80 per cent of actors are out of work and on top of that the number who are paid so-called ‘telephone number fees’ is ...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-02 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
2020-08-02 | vdrobny | 84 | view |
2018-02-27 | ravigujar123 | 89 | view |
2016-08-25 | ravibharaths | 85 | view |
2015-06-25 | roxanaluca | 58 | view |
- some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The percentage of smokers and the alcohol consumption in liters in United States of America, Japan, Holland and Turkey. 70
- After being involved in an accident, you were looked after by another person. Write a special letter to express your thanks. You should write at least 150 words. You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 90
- The diagram opposite shows how a thermos flask works Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 58
- The graph below shows the percentage change in the number of international students graduating from universities in different Canadians provinces between 2001 and 2006. 60
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.031 0.07
Pay attention to coherence.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 269 350
No. of Characters: 1235 1500
No. of Different Words: 165 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.05 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.591 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.569 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 81 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 54 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.214 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.799 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.286 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.534 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.031 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5