Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Whether to design newly constructed buildings in big cities by governments or someones who finance the construction of a building is an opinion which sparks great controversy. In my opinion, I would argue that the government should be better than others when they control the design one.
The idea of controlling design for new buildings in the metropolis by some people who have enough money can be beneficial for several reasons. Indeed, when the government want to build new skyscrapers, they also think about communities and architectures around one which could fit and facilitate these things. This can lead to a complex process for newly constructed building, while others do not worry it too much. They can try to create concept for their buildings as much as possible. By doing that, the company or organisation could be easier to choose the best that suite and express much their images to customers as a special marketing.
On the other hand, designing the style of newly building should be better with the government. Indeed, some companies want to the best things for building. This can result in a bad environment in their neighborhood area. For instance, one company want to build a skyscraper that take a large land, while this locate beside forest. As a consequence, they could cut trees to make space for construction. Therefore, it is a reason that why governments need to control the design to avoid that situation. Moreover, if people can design and build any skyscrapers which they like, it would be messy in the big cities because each person have a different vision about beauty. This can allow a difference in the ones. As a consequence, the cities is less attractive with tourists. It may decrease profit in tourism industry. With this, governments might not enough finance to invest in transport infrastructure or education.
In conclusion, despite some several benefits on the design of newly constructed buildings by others who have financed, governments should be controlled the style of buildings. It would be better for society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09117647059 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88818587474 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520588235294 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2463782366 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.55 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386705338733 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112695833879 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114225272687 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296698034051 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819931958155 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.