Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is indeed obvious that one of the reasons contributing to the deterioration of the environment comes down to discarded plastics from packaging of goods. A question has been raised that if they are good producers who should bear the responsibility towards this problem. In contrast, by all accounts, the issue can be lightened by controlling the consumption of customers.
It cannot be denied that with the popularization of e-commerce, online shopping is in demand, along with offline shopping, and has transformed the consuming habit of customers. It is worth underlining that not only were goods wrapped by plastics as they used to be, but it is also covered by carton boxes or styrofoam nowadays. As a consequence, the environment has to face up with a triple-increase in the number of litter thrown away from packaging. Therefore, it would be correct to assume that consumers should raise their awareness of buying behaviour. Making this become a reality, there are many ways such as buying goods from stores directly or reprocessing boxes or plastics.
On the other hand, the aspect to consider regarding the reason for expanding the number of packaging of goods of manufacturers concerns economics. On account of the demand of consumers, manufacturers are required to mass-produce products covered by boxes, plastics or soft foam. It can be observed that these materials are cheap and convenient, however, it takes them a long time to decompose. The primary reason for this attitude is that most producers take into consideration maximizing the profit outweighing conserving the ecosystem. Once companies pay more attention to methods to lessen the non-biodegradable materials such as substituting organic packaging, this will turn the environment into greener and greener.
In conclusion, if this issue continues to endure, our planet will be destroyed in many ways. Therefore, from my perspective, not only manufacturers but also every individual need to unite in order to conserve and recover the ecosystem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.340625 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21208502913 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5548212455 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.933333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13170563647 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423398888875 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468373152179 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738086410536 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344964523748 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.