Some people that government should make investment in building public libraries in every town while other thinks it's a waste of money because we have assess to information via internet discuss both views and give your opinion
In today’s world, the accessibility of all information can easily be taken by playing the internet. some people think that public libraries are not necessary for learning anymore. However, some people argue that the investment in public libraries in every city is still important for all citizens. Both of these views will be discussed carefully.
To begin with, those people who think that the state should not support building public libraries claim that in order to search some information the internet is more effective and convenient than libraries. firstly, the internet is a powerful resource which provides interesting multimedia information unlike traditional published books in libraries. A variety range of information such as video documentaries and world-wide academic journals can be boosted the interest of readers. searching some online data via the internet, it can help users delve in deep some details which are better than searching it online. users only put some short key-words and all related information will come up eventually within a few minutes. All of these points support the idea that why investing on public libraries is not worth anymore since people can use the internet to study.
However, there are these people who assert libraries, hold some arguments. first, providing libraries is still required in most citizens and a society. The library is a place that citizens can entertain, relax and do some work. people can be more enjoyable to read a wide range of books and a variety of magazines in their free time. Secondly, without libraries in a city, it will be hard to encourage all citizens to love reading. As education can develop citizens, libraries play an important role to stimulate people to upgrade their knowledge or encourage people to achieve in higher education. Therefore, the government still should subsidize sufficient money in order to build and develop public libraries.
In conclusion, even though the internet is accessible and convenient, the value of libraries is still overestimated. Personally, I agree that the government should develop and support public libraries which can boost and improve all citizens to be more knowledgeable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...asily be taken by playing the internet. some people think that public libraries are ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...ffective and convenient than libraries. firstly, the internet is a powerful resource wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Searching
...can be boosted the interest of readers. searching some online data via the internet, it c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Users
...ch are better than searching it online. users only put some short key-words and all r...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
... assert libraries, hold some arguments. first, providing libraries is still required ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
... can entertain, relax and do some work. people can be more enjoyable to read a wide ra...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36206896552 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87575778269 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522988505747 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4454588137 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2105263158 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3157894737 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264531997512 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890132285463 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564156523379 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175705533335 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516897323898 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.