Some people have argued that videogames are a waste of time and people should spend their time and money on better hobbies Compare and contrast the benefits of video games with other hobbies In your opinion which is more useful Why

Essay topics:

Some people have argued that videogames are a waste of time, and people should spend their time and money on better hobbies.
Compare and contrast the benefits of video games with other hobbies. In your opinion, which is more useful? Why?

An increasing number of people believes that video games are a waste of time and money, and they suggest that people should find other better hobbies. This essay will argue that video games not only cause several problems, but also in some cases, they have some benefits.

The relevant aspect of that is related to healthy problems caused by video games. This kind of problems are increasingly frequent in the life of people who play video games for a long time because when you play video games, you don’t have physical activity like when you play sports, as basket or fencing. By contrast, the majority of other hobbies allow you to move your body, an as a result you can avoid heart diseases.

However, with regard to social aspects, video games have more benefits. If gamers play online, they could know other people around the world. As a result, they could be part of the community of that video game, they would interact with other gamers. Furthermore, they could improve their ability to work as a team. On the other hand, in other hobbies, the interaction with others isn’t required, like reading, collecting, and writing novels too.

In conclusion, many researches display that the faults of video game are more than benefits. Even if you can improve your ability to be part of a community thanks to playing video games, in general the weaknesses outweigh the benefits. Hopefully, all video games should be programmed with several automatic pauses during the game each hour, as the researchers have demonstrated.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (5 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, in conclusion, in general, kind of, as a result, in some cases, with regard to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98449612403 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42942570338 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1836589738 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9230769231 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329903428745 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117333074668 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927972329785 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209576573925 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101684215684 0.056905535591 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.