Some people opine that a new language should be invented for people from different countries to use for international communication. How do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Internationalisation promises greater understanding and cooperation among the nations of the world, enabling mankind to combat collectively several global threats that are looming large. It is believed that the introduction of a unique language universally would be highly desirable and effective. This essay will highlight the advantages of establishing this via-media approach and how its advantages will outweigh the dis-advantages.
First and foremost the initiation of a global language will break many barriers, provided that the implementation is successful. Human beings are facing burning issues such as global warming, energy crisis, and impending threat of war, which is taking its toll slowly and steadily. For e.g. an effective means to build rapport across the globe would be to form an international language for closer communication. It is a proven fact when exchange of ideas becomes faster and easier, the turnaround time for responses becomes reasonably quicker and effective.
On closely analysing the facts, forming an international language would unfortunately involve difficulties and have its downsides as well. One of the main objectives should be its compatibility to any region of the world. For instance Laryngeal (related to vocal cord) differences from place to place would be a serious obstacle, and this should be handled with utmost caution and sensitivity. Furthermore, the idea may have to face stiff opposition politically and socially from many corners of the world, hence, all aspects have to be considered.
In short, this essay dwelt on how the creation of an international language would be most advantageous in eradicating many adversities, while it improves global situations where language poses a glitch and appears as a daunting task to accomplish.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion of a global language will break many barriers, provided that the implementati...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58608058608 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26563299227 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608058608059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2133586932 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.083333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208825818533 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711656075311 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502073660755 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12270859471 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229733979706 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.