Some people opine that a new language should be invented for people from different countries to use for international communication. How do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Learning a new language is not everyones’ cup of tea. However, it is proposed that the introduction of a new language for the purpose of international communication will be advantageous to people all over the globe. This essay will highlight how the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of initiating a new language.
Firstly introducing a new global language may help drastically improve multinational communication, even though it may not be acceptable to all. One of the primary reasons is that English, though it is a global language and is being extensively used universally by all genres of people remains challenging for some. Given this scenario, the inclusion of a new language could break language barriers, thereby exponentially improving world trade and communication. For example if Germany and France introduce a common language, it would be far easier for students and international travelers to communicate while travelling to those respective countries, rather than having to learn the local language, which could prove to be a daunting task.
Secondly, having multiple existing languages across the globe could be complex ,hence people feel that a generic language would help in enhancing business developments, be it trading or economic wealth. On the other hand, while the inclusion of a new language could be useful in worldwide interaction, it could also be disadvantageous for those who are not linguistic in nature. For example, if one language was spoken across countries, the value of a person’s mother tongue / traditional language would lose its glamour, respect and identity. However, it would still be advantageous to have one unique language, which can easily be learnt and spoken for better understanding and improved comprehension, provided that it is unanimously accepted and successfully implemented.
In short, this essay highlighted the advantages of introducing a new language, which can be instrumental in removing language obstacles already existing in international communication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...guages across the globe could be complex ,hence people feel that a generic languag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61363636364 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36384377723 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6036221835 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.083333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3407349848 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142496968656 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694520303117 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230022214949 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767653138751 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.