some people say that all secondary and higher secondary school students should be taught how to manage money as it is an important lifeskill.
Students should be taught in schools and with friends and parents. Here, some people believe that they should be taught how to manage money because it is the important skill in their life.
I agree with this statement because so
many reasons
for that. Firstly, students learn everything in secondary and higher secondary school. It is a base for them, how to think, make a goal and what is important. If we taught them in that time they taught very easily and they give important to money. Secondly, sometimes students forgot their good way and they go in a wrong way. They use money in the wrong way. They use money in the wrong way if they learn about the importance of money in school time; they understand what is better for them.
Generally, students saw their parents how to manage money, they understand easily. All higher secondary students are believed that they are in high standard so, they can do everything in their life, and if parents told them something they do not like.
Money can do everything to people. It is too important to taught students, how to save money and how to manage money. Finally, I believe that schools are basic for them and it is the base for taught about the money and everything. It is the best time to teach them about the management of money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I agree with this statement because so many reasons for that. Firstly, studen...
^^^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...dents forgot their good way and they go in a wrong way. They use money in the wrong way. They ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61038961039 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31798678247 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 176.041082164 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450216450216 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7245670319 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.0 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352487117124 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140361017672 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109115135967 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202508541284 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132503839968 0.056905535591 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.0946893788 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 12.4159519038 74% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.23 8.58950901804 73% => Dale chall readability score is low.
difficult_words: 27.0 78.4519038076 34% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.