Technology brought a profound change in all aspects of life. A fair number of people argue that traditional newspapers and magazines will totally replaces by e books and technology. from my perspective I completely agree with the given statement. E books and modern technology are more efficient than the traditional newspapers.
There are numerous reasons why technology replaces newspapers. Reading newspapers from mobile phones tablets or other electronic gadgets is a very easy and simple way. Mobile application provides plethora of comfort to a reader than reading from a newspaper. For example, at any place one can access to news by the help of newspaper. In journeys one can use the electronic device with ease and go through the Bulltin. Moreover, by using electronic media one can get enormous information about any activities happened instantly. Whereas in traditional newspapers the information given is so limited. There are also an entirely different set of evidences to strengthen my view point.
Digital media provides the visuals and video clips which is more effective than the newspaper. In addition, the mobile application provides both video clipping and the pdf copies of the daily news. By accessing to the digital media one can get the oldest news with in no time but this type of option is not available for the traditional newspapers.in addition using electronic applications helps in reducing usage of paper.
To conclude that the traditional newspapers will completely replaces by the technology. The ongoing technology has the huge advantage and benefits than the newspapers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Technology brought a profound change in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'replace'
Suggestion: replace
...l newspapers and magazines will totally replaces by e books and technology. from my pers...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...lly replaces by e books and technology. from my perspective I completely agree with ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent than the traditional newspapers. There are numerous reasons...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 543, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bout any activities happened instantly. Whereas in traditional newspapers the informati...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idences to strengthen my view point. Digital media provides th...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions helps in reducing usage of paper. To conclude that the tra...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'replace'
Suggestion: replace
... traditional newspapers will completely replaces by the technology. The ongoing technolo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40711462451 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99303716868 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557312252964 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7803731323 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4705882353 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8823529412 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182451468194 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680087174522 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092687026864 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146970418269 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120444521672 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.