Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree.
The issue of replacing the traditional way of documenting with modern methods has grown in importance in past decades. Personally, I agree with the idea of replacing newspapers and magazines with e-books and other modern devices.
Nowadays, we are surrounded by modern technological advancements. Not only does technology provide a vast number of people with their requirements, but it also facilitates their everyday life tasks like driving with the help of artificial intelligence. Thus, they are willing to utilize e-books instead of traditional ways of documenting such as newspapers and magazines because they find it quite more comfortable to use. Consequently, people completely replace newspapers with e-books in the long run. Research findings concerning this matter confirm that the tendency towards modern technology of documenting and reading has experienced substantial growth.
Moreover, from an environmental perspective, modern technologies are environmentally friendly methods to not only document but also read newspapers and magazines. The traditional way of producing them requires a sizable amount of paper and, in turn, more trees cut down. Thus, this traditional method is a threat to the environment, which causes deforestation and irreparable damages to wild habitat. Since in the production of modern devices like e-books there is no need to cut down trees, utilizing them is an environmental approach, and it will replace the traditional method. In the process of making newspapers, for instance, a tree at an early age cuts down, while millions of newspapers are produced annually.
Due to the reasons mentioned above, I would argue that traditional ways of documenting and reading will be replaced by modern methods.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64528301887 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21826400581 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596226415094 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.555939758 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.076923077 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279992549416 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107520098421 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624886909403 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181044127179 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448618274683 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.