Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the world where a large proportion of population is in poor conditions and hungry for food, some argue that the utmost solution for this problem is to keep the economy growing while other individuals think that such growth causes severe environmental issues and should be ceased. In my opinion, I believe that ending poverty and hunger is enormously important and that the economy should be strongly developed.
On the one hand, there are several damages in the environment which the growth of economy brings. For instance, ozone depletion is one severe consequence of economic industrialization. This is being caused by the increase in the number of factories which emit harmful materials into the atmosphere. As a result, mankind is now facing a high risk of skin cancer by exposing directly to UV rays from the sun. In addition, deforestation for wood exploitation is a major factor of massive soil erosion and air pollution. When trees are being cut off, a wide area will not be covered and the soil will be eroded by rains in the long term. Furthermore, the earth will lose its natural air-filtering system which worsens the current air pollution caused by cars’ exhaust fumes.
However, despite the aforementioned setbacks, addressing the issue of poverty and hunger is still a priority. Thus, the task of developing the economy should definitely continue. Firstly, there is not an alternative way to tackle this world problem. Without a strong finance, governments cannot afford to support each and every citizen who is in need and therefore, slowing the overall development of the whole nation down. Secondly, ignoring such matter and stopping the economic growth can create a backfire on the environmental problems. For example, if residents are left starving for a long time, they will have to search for food and vegetables by destroying the natural jungles, which is as bad as deforestation.
In conclusion, while the growth of economy has some negative effects on the environment, this development should be kept unchanged to solve the world poverty and hunger for some essential reasons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15988372093 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91827890103 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584302325581 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6114516408 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177182761308 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582625293836 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619315981165 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123804232591 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476723815484 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.