Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop.
Discuss bọth views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
People have differing views about the impacts of boosting economic growth. While some hold the opinion that helps the economy take off is the unique way to halt poverty and hunger, I believe that this development puts more pressure on the government’s shoulders to address environmental problems and therefore should be stopped.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that ending world hunger and poverty is possible if the economy of this nation flourishes. Firstly, individuals have to live in poor conditions mostly because they are unemployed, so covering basic needs including accommodation is too difficult. The developing economy will create more job opportunities; therefore, they can rent a house or refurbish their refuge. Secondly, such hunger is partly due to the shortage of food, for in some nations with extreme weather conditions such as Japan, food price is more exorbitant in comparison with in other nations. A booming economy may entail the development of machines used in agriculture which boost the crop yield. Thanks to those benefits, hunger and poverty will be addressed.
On the other hand, I strongly concur with the view that the development of economy will lead to environmental deterioration. It is unavoidable that when an economy grows, it will create more waste and emissions due to the mushrooming of many manufacturing companies and the domination of machines. This can be elaborated by the serious contamination in China – a leading economy in the world. Furthermore, rich nations often have tendency to export pollution intensive activities, like manufacturing of clothing and furniture, to less developed countries, which is generously endowed with abundant natural resources. Thus, the result of this process is increase in environmental degradation in developed countries and therefore should be stopped.
In conclusion, although some people advocate the economic development to combat poverty and hunger in the world, I cannot neglect its detrimental effects on the environment and somehow think that this development should not continue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49689440994 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11875470613 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580745341615 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2049510483 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158970340148 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057443567247 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607485506961 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118999907907 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621327038548 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.