Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss bọth views and give your own opinion. (dated: July 21st, 2018)
It is comprehensible that the vigorous growth of socio-economy deems to be essential to alleviate poverty status of nations around the world as a breakthrough. However, I strongly believe that this solution encompasses various potential risks, which may pose a serious threat to the sustainable development of our environment.
On the one hand, many governments are determined to enhance the economy of their countries due to some great benefits. First of all, if nations attempt to improve their financial situation, the personal income of their citizens will be boosted exponentially. As a result, there is no doubt that the number of unemployed can be mitigated as well as the huge gap between rich and poor will be narrowed. Secondly, accompanying with these changes, social welfare will be guaranteed which means the crime rate in such areas will be reduced significantly. For example, in some developed countries where the local economy has grown tremendously such as England or Japan, residents only concentrate on their jobs for higher income. Therefore, people are no longer inclined to commit crimes thanks to the outstanding contribution of economic growth.
On the other hand, this tendency also jeopardize the human environment for some prime reasons. When a region has significant economic growth, the mushrooming of industrial zones become a debatable issue that most of them have to confront with. Consequently, the emission from factories can wreck our atmosphere for a long period. Additionally, tourism is a smokeless industry that many countries tend to utilize as a useful tool in order to boost their finance but it may adversely affect the environmental landscapes. For instance, a large amount of annual travelers flock to these nations may exert a positive influence to the government budget while almost natural habitats of local wildlife are damaged.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that the development of economy is extremely necessary in any countries, I am convinced that the local authorities should figure out some viable measures to deal with a number of drawbacks in this case.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3115727003 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05505142403 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626112759644 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9587039344 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.1428571429 7.06120827912 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998741589887 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358702869231 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045096335774 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0563472405251 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128089096646 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.