In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In today’s world witnesses a huge number of high income residents as a turning point while many people assert that the politicians tend to issue some laws to control the limited salaries. From my point of view, I strongly believe that the governments should not interfere in this circumstance because a rich country always ensure the high wages for their citizens.
On the on hand, there are two main advantages of high salaries which bring a lot of benefits to the economic development of regions. First of all, if people can earn lots of money that means they may be high status people or influential people in communal activities. As a result, they will inspire everyone and people can attempt to pursue their dreams with optimistic spirits like them. Secondly, when residents do not have to worry about the low income, they are able to grab other opportunities in their life. For instance, high income people not only have a chance to live with their passion but they also can support others who have lower salaries than them.
Turning to the other part of the argument, the government still can control the income level of citizens but it may pose a threat to the natural development of their countries. For example, if the wages are control, there is no doubt that the boundaries between rich and poor will be no longer available which leads a debatable issue because people will not try their best in any circumstances. However, it also makes an outstanding contribution to an equal community between people in society. Consequently, everyone will be treated equally in anywhere such as hotel, restaurants and so on.
To conclude, in spite of the fact that there are huge profits to equal life if the politicians manage the high income level but I totally agree that they should let it improve naturally due to the benefits of rich people bring to their nation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, no doubt, such as, as a result, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8602484472 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62539207328 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3817874308 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.416666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.1666666667 7.06120827912 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230416982595 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819589284934 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522738023085 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138560163811 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514992662015 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.