Some people say the government should spend money on providing faster public transport while others believe the government should give priority to other factors such as cost and the effect on the environment. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people say that governments should give priority to the development of fast transportation in society rather than paying attention to the effects of the ambient environment. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this for two main reasons. First, advanced transportation could take its toll on the environment through air pollution and second, environmental effects such as global warming and pollution are more significant.
In terms of advanced transportation, the development of this would have an adverse impact on the environment because of the emission of greenhouse gases. In order to power such public transports as the underground or trains, fossil fuels including coal, petroleum, and oil are of necessity because that materials ensure the function of these vehicles. However, this poses a threat to the environment due to the excessive amount of toxic gases emitted into the atmosphere, which not only worsens the air quality but also contributes to the rise of the ambient temperature.
Apart from the reason expressed above, the environmental effects including global warming and pollution are worth-considering in the long-term. It is thought that plants and trees play an indispensable role in regulating the climate because they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and release oxygen back into it. If vast areas of vegetation are burnt or removed, the consequences including the release of stored carbon dioxide and the shortage of oxygen provided to humans will be likely to occur. This is also accompanied by the exploitation of forests for selling timbers, infrastructural development, and farming, all of which are thus even more damaging. That is the reason governments should spend their budget to prevent these situations from happening in the first place.
In conclusion, it is said that providing faster public transport in society should be favoured over the environmental effects. However, I think that it would be a counterproductive effect on the environment, and thus the conservation of the environment is more significant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, apart from, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47040498442 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23911745268 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563862928349 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.368309201 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.076923077 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231584808264 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797689236842 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846146596546 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144497004846 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860689852958 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.