Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some individuals argue that history is a very significant subject and should be taught well in schools. However, there are others who believe that this age requires us to make our children learn about modern sciences and technology, rather than history. There is some truth to both of these arguments and my belief is that both should be taught with a careful balance.
The school of thought that emphasizes on teaching our future generations about history, wants the children to learn from the past. It is incredibly important to never forget about our mistakes and wrong decisions of the past, otherwise we are bound to repeat them. So, in a sense, our history is a glimpse into our future, using this we can learn how to react in certain situations to avoid bad consequences. Take the example of rivalry between USA and USSR during the cold war, where both of them went out of their way to avoid a lethal conflict because both knew the dire consequences of it. Hence, teaching about history is a good way to keep our future secure.
On the other hand, people, who advocate for more emphasis on teaching kids about science and technology, want future generations to be progressive and more advanced than today's community. Moreover, looking at the rate with which scientific research is making advancements, it becomes all the more necessary to keep our young generations updated on this subject. It's not only necessary for our intellectual nourishment, but also a significant way to make sure our survival in the future world. A perfect example of this is the nation of Israel, despite living in a hostile territory, they have managed to survive and thrive, only because of their technological advancements. So, to put it simply, science and technology education in schools is necessary for future survival in the world.
In conclusion, both subjects are equally important. In my opinion, without history a nation has no identity, whereas without science it has no future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ooking at the rate with which scientific research is making advancements, it beco...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96686746988 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74454287716 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.420581201 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173087706723 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600562026101 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329935651374 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106654952256 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288125920195 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.