Present technologies are learned from the histories which have been researched in the past. So, The chronicle relates and continues the information in the development of modern science and technology. However, both parties have contradictive argument whether learning science and technology is more fully useful rather than the history.
To begin with, The historical subject gives an authority for the human to always improve. There are many schools around the world where history has become the main subject. Because of this, the students hopefully can learn about the past project and expand their knowledge, not from the start but continue it. For example, Wright and the Brothers have experienced to produce an aircraft with many problems such as incidents and accidents. They spend their time to work on it. If there is no new generation who aren’t re-start about their project, maybe this day, we never know about a modern aircraft obviously.
In the other hand, science and technology give an easy access for better human life. Today, the world feel so small because of technologies capable to open the improvement of media communication by using digital, modern transportation, and spreading of information base on the internet. Furthermore, in medical development, the curing equipment for cancer has been discovered which many of the population are saved.
In conclusion, the history subject is needed because of human collect information about failure or success on it. So, the science can be founded by the information that is taking back to continue what the people did before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...other hand, science and technology give an easy access for better human life. Today, the world...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33070866142 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82474210475 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625984251969 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6135360271 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15364754758 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523137991508 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04752306627 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932799086021 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256514516927 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.