Some people say that it is impossible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that a country cannot succeed in economic development and also possess an unpolluted environment at the same time. I completely agree with this point of view.
First of all, it is obvious that achieving success in economic areas has the same meaning as the perception of the public will possibly be placed on improving the country's economy instead of paying attention to keeping their environment clean. To develop their financial conditions, citizens tend to damage the environment more and more frequently. For example, building as many factories and companies as possible or exerting numerous negative effects on the ocean or forest by reducing it to make way for shops, restaurants, and cinemas may lead to serious environmental pollution and problems. For instance, making room for one factory which can contain 3000 employees needs at least 100 trees to be removed completely, according to BBC News.
On the other hand, if people opt to save the environment, they may miss opportunities to enrich their country. Individuals need to spend a large amount of money on taking care of their surrounding areas in order to keep it clear; therefore, their budget for other demands in their lives may be diminished, which results in a decrease in GNP each year. Moreover, they may have preferences to commute by public transportation and stop traveling by their vehicles. This can cause a reduction in the price of petrol, and also the economy of the country can be impacted by far.
In conclusion, having successfully economic improvements means that people living in that country may have to lose their chance to protect the environment. The people can only choose either their country's financial development or their clean and safe surroundings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14634146341 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91427121708 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602787456446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3130537421 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.083333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208676682213 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782100504814 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516960099963 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135815638001 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452140110206 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.